(第 28 期)   第十四卷第二期   2020 年 6 月 30 日出刊

古籍資料庫之人工標註與自動標註功能使用分析

The Usage Analysis between Manual and Automatic Annotation Function of Sinology Database

本文關鍵字:使用者調查全文檢索數位人文介面設計古籍資料庫User SurveyFull-text SearchDigital HumanitiesInterface DesignAncient Book Database

本文摘要

過往數位人文研究多由內容探勘層面,經由分析文本內容,提供研究者對於內容比對的基本分析資訊,較缺乏由使用者閱讀行為角度提供輔助閱讀工具。古籍內容的標註可以增加對於文本內容的詮釋與補充敘述,產生概念間的連結,亦可與其他學習者分享,形成知識交流,對於提升閱讀理解具有相當助益。 本研究設計是以建構在閱讀古籍特性所開發的兩種標註系統功能,分析30位受測者使用自動標註與人工標註兩種介面閱讀古籍,在閱讀成效、科技接受度與閱讀感受的差異。研究結果顯示:(1)使用不同標註系統對於閱讀理解成效並沒有顯著差異,但人工標註的科技接受度有用性明顯高於自動標註;(2)受測者對於自動標註的「添加新詞」與「查詢詞彙」功能,以及對人工標註的「查詢詞彙」與「新增標註」功能,有比較高的滿意度;(3)受測者認為自動標註的問題是自動斷詞不精確,人工標註是標註操作較為不易。最終對於古籍資料庫標註功能提出改善建議,提供古籍資料庫發展系統功能之參考。

Previous studies have shown that digital humanities studies are mostly based on content exploration by analyzing text content, and lack of auxiliary reading tools from the perspective of user reading behavior. The annotation of ancient books can increase the interpretation and supplementary of the content, create a link between concepts, and share with other learners to form knowledge exchange, which is quite helpful for improving reading comprehension. This study explores the functions of two annotation systems developed in ancient book database. 30 participants recruited for the study were those with humanistic background. This study analyzes the effects of reading ancient books on automatic and manual annotation system for reading effectiveness, technology acceptance and reading experience. The results of the study show that: (1) There is no significant difference in the effectiveness of reading comprehension using different annotation systems, but the usefulness of manual annotation system is significantly higher than automatic system; (2) the subjects have higher satisfaction with the "add new words" and "query vocabulary" functions of automatic annotation system, as well as the "query vocabulary" and "new labeling" functions of manual annotation system; (3) The subjects believe that the problem of automatic annotation is that automatic labelling vocabularies are inaccurate, and the manual annotation is not easy to label.


本刊著作權屬於「中華民國圖書館學會」所有。
Powered By Vanilla Journal - 香草期刊系統 0.256 / 2006 - 2007 © Weizhong Yang